DESIGN-DRIVEN PLACE BRANDING THROUGH ADAPTIVE REUSE IN MULTICULTURAL HERITAGE DISTRICTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61696/juparita.v4i2.1095Keywords:
adaptive reuse, design intervention, district identity, place branding, spatial experience potentialAbstract
Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings has become increasingly important for supporting the sustainability of historic districts. However, studies integrating design intervention, spatial character, and district identity formation within the context of place branding remain limited, particularly in multicultural heritage districts. This study aimed to examine how design interventions in heritage buildings shaped spatial character, generated spatial experience potential, and contributed to district identity formation in the Old Town of Surabaya. This research employed a qualitative approach using a multiple-case study strategy involving four heritage buildings representing different cultural zones. Data were collected through field observation, visual documentation, and literature review, and subsequently were analyzed using a descriptive-interpretative approach through spatial configuration analysis, functional transformation analysis, and cross-case comparison. The findings indicated that design interventions influenced spatial configuration, circulation patterns, functional hierarchy, and contextual integration, resulting in diverse forms of spatial experience potential. The findings further indicated that spatial experience potential functioned as a mediating mechanism between spatial transformation and place perception, while place branding in heritage districts emerged through the interaction between spatial identity, narrative meaning, and spatial experience generated through design. This study developed a design-driven place branding model that linked design intervention, spatial experience potential, and district identity formation. Future research is recommended to further validate this model through post-occupancy evaluation and visitor perception studies across different heritage district contexts.
References
Aigwi, I. E., Mendoza, L., Poorisat, T., & Nwadike, A. N. (2026). Transforming spaces: The role of adaptive reuse in strengthening urban resilience in Auckland, New Zealand. Cities, 169, 106472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106472
British Design Council. (2005). The double diamond: A universally accepted depiction of the design process. Design Council. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/news-opinion/double-diamond universally-accepted-depiction-design-process/
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Douglas, J. (2006). Building adaptation (2nd Ed.). Routledge.
Foster, G., & Saleh, R. (2021). The circular city and adaptive reuse of cultural heritage index: Measuring the investment opportunity in Europe. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 175, 105880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105880
Ghida, D.B. (2024). Revitalizing urban spaces: Ten key lessons from the “Viaduc des arts” adaptive reuse and placemaking. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 13(5), 1095-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2024.03.011
Govers, R., & Go, F. (2016). Place branding: Glocal, virtual and physical identities, constructed, Imagined and Experienced. Springer.
Kavaratzis, M., & Ashworth, G. J. (2005). City branding: An effective assertion of identity or a transitory marketing trick?. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(5), 506-514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00482.x
Kaya, D.I., Dane, G., Pintossi, N., & Koot, C.A.M. (2021). Subjective circularity performance analysis of adaptive heritage reuse practices in the Netherlands. Sustainable Cities and Society, 70, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102869
Mazzetto, S. (2023). Heritage conservation and reuse to promote sustainable growth. Materials Today: Proceedings, 85, 100-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.269
Mehr, S.Y., Skates, H., & Holden, G. (2017). Adding more by using less: Adaptive reuse of woolstores. Procedia Engineering, 180, 697-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.229
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. John Wiley & Sons.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre & every business a stage. Harvard Business School Press.
Pintossi, N., Kaya, I.K., & Roders, A.P. (2023). Cultural heritage adaptive reuse in Salerno: Challenges and solutions. City, Culture and Society, 136, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100505
Plevoets, B., & van Cleempoel, K. (2019). Adaptive reuse as a strategy towards conservation of cultural heritage: A literature review. In Adaptive reuse of the built heritage (pp. 13-33). Routledge.
Preiser, W. F. E., & Vischer, J. C. (2005). Assessing building performance. Elsevier.
Richards, G. (2011). Creativity and tourism: The state of the art. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1225-1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.07.008
Stylidis, D. (2018). Residents' place image: A cluster analysis and its links to place attachment and support for tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26, 1007-1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1435668
Tan, J., Xu, L., & Hutter, A. (2026). Post-occupancy evaluation of waterfront industrial heritage reuse in China: Assessing satisfaction and importance on Jingzhou Yang Pier historical area. Journal of Urban Management, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2026.01.005
van Laar, B., Greco, A., Remøy, H., & Gruis, V. (2024). What matters when? – An integrative literature review on decision criteria in different stages of the adaptive reuse process. Developments in the Built Environment, 18, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100439
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zenker, S., & Braun, E. (2017). Questioning a “one size fits all” city brand: Developing a branded house strategy for place brand management. Journal of Place Management and Development, 10(3), 270-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-04-2016-0018
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Daniel Pandu Mau, Freddy Hendrawan, Ramanda Dimas Surya Dinata

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





