Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Adopsi Produk Ramah Lingkungan di Kalangan Milenial Perkotaan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61696/juparita.v3i2.1000Keywords:
Eco-Friendly Product Adoption, Urban Millennials, Green Attitude–Behavior Gap, Environmental Values, Environmental KnowledgeAbstract
This study aims to analyze the factors influencing the adoption of eco-friendly products among urban millennials in Indonesia and to develop a predictive model and effective intervention strategies to reduce the green attitude–behavior gap. The research employed a mixed-methods design using a sequential explanatory approach: a quantitative phase through surveys to test relationships among variables and hypotheses, followed by a qualitative phase using in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, expert interviews, and observations in retail outlets. The population consisted of urban millennials aged 25–40 living in metropolitan cities with at least one million residents. The quantitative sample included 600 respondents, while the qualitative phase involved 40 participants plus experts and retail observations. The findings indicate that eco-friendly product adoption is significantly shaped by internal factors (environmental values and knowledge), external factors (social influence and economic conditions), and product characteristics (quality and innovativeness). Environmental values positively affect environmental concern (β = 0.52; p < 0.001), while price sensitivity negatively affects purchase intention (β = −0.32; p < 0.001). Product availability also enhances perceived behavioral control (β = 0.40; p < 0.001). The study further confirms moderating effects of green self-identity, income level, urban infrastructure, and product innovativeness. Four main adoption segments were identified (Green Champions, Selective Adopters, Price-sensitive Considerers, and Skeptical Non-adopters). The study proposes the Urban Millennial Green Adoption Model (UMGAM), integrating input factors (individual, social, contextual), processing mechanisms (cognitive, affective, behavioral), and adoption and impact outcomes. The results are expected to guide producers, retailers, and policymakers in designing more targeted strategies to promote sustainable consumption.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Pemuda Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: BPS.
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
Green Business Indonesia. (2023). Laporan Pasar Produk Ramah Lingkungan Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: GBI.
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2023). Status Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: KLHK.
Nielsen Indonesia. (2023). Indonesia Consumer Report: Sustainability and Green Consumption.
Ottman, J. A. (2011). The New Rules of Green Marketing: Strategies, Tools, and Inspiration for Sustainable Branding. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: Behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 195-228.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
UNEP. (2022). Global Guidelines for Environmental Labeling and Claims. United Nations Environment Programme.
Arli, D., & Tjiptono, F. (2018). Why do people buy organic food? The moderating role of environmental concerns and trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42, 78-85.
Barbarossa, C., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2016). Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: A comparison between green and non-green consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 229-247.
Chan, R. Y. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 18(4), 389-413.
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behavior and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1-2), 128-143.
Kautish, P., Paul, J., & Sharma, R. (2019). The moderating influence of environmental consciousness and recycling intentions on green purchase behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1425-1436.
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503-520.
Moisander, J. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(4), 404-409.
Paco, A. M. F., & Raposo, M. L. B. (2010). Green consumer market segmentation: Empirical findings from Portugal. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(4), 429-436.
Rex, E., & Baumann, H. (2007). Beyond ecolabels: What green marketing can learn from conventional marketing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(6), 567-576.
Sachdeva, S., Jordan, J., & Mazar, N. (2015). Green consumerism: Moral motivations to a sustainable future. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 60-65.
Situmorang, D.,M et.al”Analysis Of Accounting Knowledge Behavior and Accounting Recording on Revenue with Cultural Behavior Moderating Variable” Al-Mal: Journal Of Islamic Accounting and Finance [ONLINE] Volume 05 Number 02 (Des 31, 2024)
Situmorang, D. M. (2019). the Effect of Taxpayer Awarenes and Fiskus Service on Performance of Tax Revenue With Taxpayer Compliance As Intervening Variables. Management and Sustainable Development Journal, 1(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.46229/msdj.v1i1.98
Taufique, K. M. R., Vocino, A., & Polonsky, M. J. (2017). The influence of eco-label knowledge and trust on pro-environmental consumer behaviour in an emerging market. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(7), 511-529.
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer "attitude–behavioral intention" gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169-194.
White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22-49
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Uning Heri Gagarin, Yeni Trisna Purba, Frans Favo Purba S

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





